U.S. has a Nuclear Hit List »
Posted By omerazam 3 months, 1 week ago in NewsThe Bush administration has reportedly ordered the Pentagon to prepare contingency plans for attacking seven countries with nuclear weapons
Read Full Story at macedoniaonline.eu »
Submitted By:
omerazam
New to Social Media and trying to learn the skills, here to socialze with people who are active in this field.
Related Articles:
Why not submit a story?
Join the Discussion 
+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 18
-
-
0%
foksipayne3 months ago
Ha, my first comment was going to be, (still is) Any one truly surprised by this?
Reply
-
-
-
-
0%
foksipayne3 months ago
I can't say if I agree that they SHOULD say it. I mean there are always extenuating circumstances, possible.
Reply
-
-
-
0%
NoSpinDave3 months ago
Lol, and this from that "fair and balanced" bastion of unbiased media, Macedoniaonline....lol.
Please, do you HONESTLY think Russia, China, India, Packistan, Isreal, and any other nuclear nation does not have some kind of plan if they were to ACTUALLY USE their nukes? What do you think, they all would get together 10 mins before they needed to use them and say "hey, where are we sending these things anyway?"
What a dumb, biased, mis-leading, typical "hate America", totally par for the course Libscape, liberal extremist post.
SINK
Reply-
0%
foksipayne3 months ago
I don't look at it as "hate America" I see it as "prepare America".
Remember, we are entering our "last days."
...The end is near.
Does that frighten anyone? No, we keep on with our day to day lives. So it is good to know that we should be prepared. Just think, if we do wind up using them, then surely, someone will agree that we were wrong and use theirs on us.
Reply-
0%
NoSpinDave3 months ago
"Remember, we are entering our "last days."
...The end is near. Just think, if we do wind up using them, then surely, someone will agree that we were wrong and use theirs on us."
Yea, but the difference is...and its a huge one...that we have two of the three fazes of the missile defense shield operational....and nobody else in the world has anything close. Why do you think Putin has been so upset about our plans to use it in eastern Europe? He knows it works and it tips the balance of power to us in any confrontation of the sort.
Reply
-
-
-
0%
LARK3 months ago
Recently there was news of a tragedy in which a dog tore a little girl to pieces because the dog thought that the kid was trying to hurt its cubs which was not true. The dog was only hyper sensitive. It was put to rest.
Reply -
0%
Cityslicker3 months ago
Yesterday U.S. secretly removed Uranium from Iraq , huh !
What is Uranium used for , power plants and what else ?
Reply -
0%
canadianrancher573 months ago
I read the artical, then the comments then I decided to read the artical again and I got a different view than some of the above comments.
The idea of using small scale nuclear weapons as a battlefield weapon, the idea of using a nuclear weapon against an opponent that cannot be beaten by conventional weapons or the idea of using nuclear weapons against countries that attack our so called (friends) takes the idea of deterent completly out of picture.
The adoption of a special case scenerio by the government of The US. will be the policy that will be adopted by all other nations that have or are developing nuclear weapons.
There has been and always will be only one use for nuclear weapons and that is as a deterent anything else is a path to an all out destruction of our species.
Reply-
0%
foksipayne3 months ago
I got a similar POV as yours. I think some ppl are just trying to blow it out of proportion, pardon the pun...
Reply
-
-
0%
sstnt3 months ago
I was in the Air Force, 79 to 99, Missile Launch Officer. There were always contingency plans for use of nuclear weapons, in more a bi- and tri- polar world (Russia and China targets mainly). A WMD attack always was planned to be responded to with nukes, since we had eliminated most of our gas and bio weapons so that wasn't an option. BUT there were contingencies for battlefield first use of nukes in Europe if the USSR attacked and we couldn't stop them with conventional forces. My question is NOT why my Government is making plans and preparing for different contingencies. To not do so is imprudent to the point of dereliction of duty. No, my question is how a SECRET report on our national security plans is presented to Congress on Friday....and appears in the LA times by the Weekend. This is treasonous!
Reply -
0%
canadianrancher573 months ago
sstnt- This is just a guess to your question but since congress is both democrats and republicans some members may be trying to affect public opinion. I sort of agree with you though if it is a secret document realeasing it for any reason should be looked at as a security violation.
Reply -
0%
sstnt3 months ago
Releasing a document classified as SECRET or TOP SECRET (my guess is it was TOP SECRET) for political reasons is just as bad as releasing it for money...it is for personal gain. There are laws against this, unfortunately not used often enough.
If they want the information out there in the public, they need to get it reclassified. The only person that can do that "on the fly" so to speak is the President.
Reply
Add a Comment
Please keep your comments relevant to this story.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.